Theo Logicians Needed
Opening Statement:
The more this world is observed, the more obvious it is that it lacks direction. There is no single and effective system of management and in fact the world has no Theory of Management, meaning this world has no idea as to how it ought to be administrated. If it has any management structure at all the primary component in it is luck. This world more than anything, resembles a casino. The future depends on the influence of horseshoes, rabbit feet and a lady called luck, more than it does on data.
Politics, economics and our religions all rely on a throw of the dice. There is nothing that is predictable in any of these things. Many hope that religion will save us, or some religious figure perhaps wrapped in the cloak of nationalism, patriotism or a particular political party. But if you look at religion, politics and economics from the perspective of a theory of management, we see they all have one thing in common; they all use a law based administrate system and a good deal of luck.
The world is much like a Black Box; a person may work at what he or she is good at, but what the result of this is unknown, there is no telling what will come out of the other end of the Black Box.
The Bible tells us that faith can save us, but so do politicians. Most advertisements have within their message that the product can be trusted, even if it is accompanied by a list of a hundred side effects. The question is then who do we have faith in? We must trust someone or something. Not even religion, divorced from faith, can give us the results needed. But which religion do we trust with our future?
Religion without faith only gives us one more legalistic system to govern us, and we have too many of these already. Everything is compromised, even science, without faith, but the question of who to trust is always with us. Too many work to earn our trust, only so they can defraud us.
Only those who have faith can appreciate the power of faith, even if they do not understand it. But the only ones who can do this have found someone or something they can trust, even love.
Not even apologetics works well without the power of faith, logic not guided by faith can become purposeless. We can tell people about why we have the hope we have, but unless the argument is presented based on faith, we are only providing anecdotal evidence.
It ought not be such a problem to get people to have faith. If a person does not have faith, what does he or she have? But the problem is, people professing faith is no guarantee they have it. People always seem to pose some level of risk. This is why we need a theory of management. Management is about risk management, that is what administrators do, they modify risk.
Perhaps the science we use has only served to distract us from the need for faith, yet what is science or anything else that we do not believe in? No amount of information is going to eliminate the need for trust. To start with, do we trust science with our future? Do we think scientists are the ones to give power to?
Empiricists tell us to reject religion as representing nothing but empty promises. Have the promises of science been realized?
Too much in society is a struggle for power.
Rejecting the necessity of faith, that is the reduction of risk, permits liberals to validate whatever liberals want validated. Maybe empirical science is more about confirmation bias than a genuine search for the truth; the truth being that which we can have unqualified faith in. The truth eliminates risk, but science has come to reject the search for truth, meaning they have lack faith in their ability to find the truth.
A relationship is nothing without faith and dies when faith is destroyed. Love is the power of faith focused on one other person. How do we trust which represents risk and has no program in place that will serve to reduce and perhaps eliminate risk?
Love is powerful because, especially for the young, it is overwhelming to experience total trust. Which means putting oneself at maximum risk yet feeling there is no risk.
Most of us have lost faith in science, religion and politics. No one claims science is a search for the truth anymore. It has become an aimless and undirect accumulation of data points. This ought to worry us, but we appear to be getting used to the idea there is nothing we can trust or put our faith in.
Few thinks another election will change anything. Business has become something to be feared more than the answer to our problems.
Everything we know appears to represent an unacceptable level of risk. Love itself is being considered more of a source of risk than something to strive for.
Living in faith needs to be normalized, in truth, it needs to be prioritized. Science is not incompatible with God, but to live fully Christ-like and by the findings of science, requires science to be truthful and not agenda driven. Science needs to be transformed into something we can have faith in.
To have faith is to eliminate risk. We cannot live in faith, this is the point, if we keep living in a world where there is risk.
The world needs people who are first and foremost people of faith, because these are people one can have faith in. Christianity is the people of faith who follow the one person we can have unqualifies faith in. To have faith is nothing more than us seeking what is certain.
Christians claim they have faith.
They even claim to live in faith.
Christians claim they have faith in Christ. This is a claim without the means of substantiation. We talk about faith as if it is God Himself, or an absolute.
Most Christians view on faith makes it appear as if it is an impenetrable fortress. Yet, how many when things do not go their way, collapse into anger and the language of betrayal.
Faith is not a property we possess. It is more a statement about the condition of one’s existence. One does not just paint faith over the rust and mildew of one’s life. To have faith is to have access to the things which reduce risk.
One can claim to have faith while mired in quicksand, but the risk is not ameliorated by words.
Even in Christian theology, it makes little sense to say one has faith while devoid of the Holy Spirit. Yet, everyone claims God is omnipotent and we are saved by faith, yet believe it is our faith that saves, making it about us, to the degree that everyone thinks they will be saved, often those that do not even believe in God, think their faith will save them.
Theology is the pure and applied science that studies the logical and analytical mind of the Almighty. To be part of the church is to be part of the Great Experiment that proves faith is justified. To be a Christian one becomes an applied theologian.
The first step towards becoming a theologian is to admit there is no way to scientifically validate the proposition that physical reality exists. Theology is the only science we can trust. Materialism is a superfluous doctrine that creates too much unnecessary complications without adding much in the way of useful data.
If we postulate that reality is a substance, we need to explain all that does not have substance. Which would be less of an issue if not for the fact that all that matters to us, lacks substance. Love, truth, morality, logic and consciousness are immaterial things, to mention just a few of the things which cannot be said to be physical.
If we postulate a physical reality exists, we must explain how it is we are separate from the animal kingdom though physically we must remain a part of it.
What humans are, cannot be defined by our physical appearance, regardless of how hard we try.
Then we have the problem of civilization, which is not physical though it can be seen to some extent in its buildings and technologies. Civilization is predicated on knowledge and trust, which are not physically observable things.
It is through civilization that we divide ourselves more fully from the rest of the world. It is through science that we become a people set apart and find the tools that lead us to perfection. Perfection is not found in nature in a form man can use. Perfection for mankind is a uniquely human condition. Only Christianity is able to develop a perfect people in a perfect civilization obedient to the perfect Will of God, if we employ theology as our science of choice.
Definitions And Descriptions
Theo Logics is theology developed by Apriorian.
Theo Logics is the theological study of the logical and analytical perfection of the Almighty.
Theo Logics is a movement that promotes the scientific study of the analytical perfection of God.
Theo Logics is a replacement for the politics, economics and religions developed by legalists to justify their parasitism.
All legalists are parasites. The law is the cover for parasites
As a ministry Theo Logics is an experiment that tests the validity of the God Hypothesis. Theo Logicians are the Test Group. The world, which we consider apriotic, or spiritually immature, forms the Control Group.
The proposition of the experiment is that:
· God Exists
· God is the most perfect of all possible conceptions. If anything, higher or more perfect exists, that thing is God.
· All things, including man, can have no other purpose or duty than to seek to be as God is. We need to separate from everything that is not seeking to be perfect as our Heavenly Father is perfect.
· Theo Logics is the theology of Perfection. We study God as the epitome of perfection and therefore, the object to which we are inherently drawn.
Theo Logics puts science in the service of God. This makes science a moral pastime. This gives science a direction and purpose, for it is not possible to be moral and be without purpose or direction.
Science either adds value to the planet, or it does not. It is the adding of value to assets that defines morality. It is the necessity to add value to the earth by means of the things we do, that gives our lives direction and purpose.
The Theo Logics Movement
Theo Logics is a movement to find God through science, as a systematic, and precise path, governed by hard data.
The building up of the movement and the creation of small groups and communities is done as part of a scientific experiment that validates the propositions of the experiment.
The church grows as it increases in value. Humans can do only one of two things. We can add value to the things of God, or detract from the value created by God, by consuming more than we produce.
No matter how someone wishes to argue the case, no one can refute this simple fact, we are a positive or negative influence on the world. We are either adding value, or we are taking it away.
Humans cannot live free. To live, we must consume resources. To do this requires an expenditure of energy. We either expend this energy ourselves or someone does this in lieu of us. If we rely on others to supply us with our needs, we are a dependent if we are a child, and a parasite if we are an adult.
The Theo-Logics Movement is a ministry for eliminating parasites from among us, so we can take back our power and things God gave to us, His church.
The Holy Spirit is our guide to the truth. We believe the truth can and needs to be verified, scientifically. Our life as Theo-Logicians are guided by hard evidence and verifiable data.
Theo-Logics is a scientific experiment that produces hard data to demonstrate the validity of the Bibles claims.
Who We Are.
Theo-Logics is a ministry to separate sheep from goats. Theo-Logics takes power away from parasites and restores it to the believer.
Theo-Logics is designed as a scientific experiment to validate faith by measuring in an objective and scientifically credible way, the difference between living as the world lives and living in accordance with the logic of God.
Theo-Logics has no parasitism, no inequality and no payment transfers. Theo-Logicians own what they create. We have no need for the state.
The experiment needs only three persons to start. Ministries can be started anywhere by anyone without risk or fear of loss.
Ministry members help each other in any way they can. A unit of account is used to keep the exchanges fair.
All who work get paid, that is the Theo-logics credo. Whether one adds value through work or investment one is paid for the value one adds to the ministry.
Theo-Logics operates as small group ministries. These are from 3 to fifteen members. When a small group increases in numbers that become unmanageable it divides into two or three daughter cells. Each cell or small group has a chairperson. The chairperson may be an elder or deacon depending on the type of ministry being performed.
General Councils are headed by Elders and are organized by political jurisdiction. These also serve as a political party. The chairperson of the jurisdiction runs for political office, when this is deemed beneficial to the movement.
The Limited Councils are headed by Deacons who preside over the businesses of Theo-Logics.
There are two different occupational sectors. Deacons head the twelve sectors and the constituent businesses. The General Council oversees issues between the various sectors according to the jurisdiction they are in.
No higher council deals with any issue that cannot be resolved within a lower council. The Principle of Subsidiarity is applied.
There is not state in the liberal sense of the word, as there are no free riders. The Elders and Deacons serve as the administrators and judiciary. The Theo-Logics system is an amalgamation of religion, politics and economics.
The Deacons run the economic element, and the Elders serve as the political arm. The body of believers are the church.
How Science Replaces The State
If there is no data, then there is the raw exercise of power. If power is utilized, injustice will follow. No one is able to exercise power without unduly benefitting themselves and those who had the means to put him in office.
Power applied produces law and regulatory statutes. Those who have the power to do this form the state. Without the power and authority to produce law there is no state.
But without power transfers of wealth in the form of taxation and extortion is not possible. Without this power there is not state. Without the state there is no parasitism.
Parasites have no power of their own; they need the state to authorize and justify their extortion. The state justifies free riding transfers of wealth to legitimize its own power and existence. If the state did not legitimize the needs and claims of parasites, it would have no role to play. The gainfully employed do not need the state. It is only parasites and the need of a parasite to have access to the wealth of others, that justifies the state.