Being Anti-Demonic

This author has written extensively about what it means to be the church and how to identify a Christian. I think I can say with some certainty that all of it has fallen on deaf ears. So to avoid doing the same thing over and over again hoping someone will allow it to register on the soul, this time we will look at demonic possession, not the media version but the kind we meet at work and when we shop and also on-line.

The most obvious symptom of demonic possession is that the person is not logical. They do not understand logical thought; they are not moral because morality is analytical. And of course they see metaphysics as anathema. If something does not seem solidly real, it is not real.

The best way to understand demonic possession is as stunted maturity in the spiritual sense.

We all grow physically but we do not all grow spiritually. Therefore we will see physical adults who never mature spiritually. The devil cannot create. He and his demons can only corrupt. So, the demon possessed are not new creatures, they are stunted forms of what they might have been.

It is possible to go down a rabbit hole here and start bringing in all manner of elements to describe this and that. In fact, it is not that complicated. There are various ways to describe the situation, however. The easiest way is to say we follow God or Satan. This does not help because everyone feels free to explain what this means. We can say we are governed by the flesh or the spirit. But everyone feels they are guided by the spirit. Not even materialists will admit to being a slave to their endocrine system though logically they would need to be to make their philosophy make sense.

This is another sign of demonic possession. Demonics will never make sense and if one is at all philosophically inclined, it does not take much in the way of observation to notice Demonic theories are full of contradictions.

A clear example of this is their position regarding God. They will claim the existence of God is not proven, while refusing to acknowledge not only that the existence of physical reality has never been proven, but that it has been proven many times that there is no way to demonstrate physical reality exists. To begin with, empiricism does not deal in absolute proofs.

But that is not the worst of it. The arguments demonics use to discredit believers is full of contradictions and inconsistencies. How can one say there is no God when this is an absolute and analytical statement, something not available to empiricists and those who utilize inductive reasoning.

What God are they talking about. It is important to ask because the god’s they reject do not exist and everyone knows they do not exist. If the knew God and accepted who He is, they could not deny him. It is not possible.

However, this is just the bind they are in, because there is only one truth and only one reality that is God breathed and coherent. But this is not the reality demonics believe in. But where does that leave them if they choose to denounce truth and a view of reality that is coherent?

If you deny truth, you become a person promoting lies, and lies must always conflict with the truth, but lies also with each other. If the reality of lies was coherent it would have been developed by God, but as it is not coherent, if was not developed by God, which means it of necessity, was designed by Satan.

Something created must be coherent. If a book is authored and it lacks cohesion, it is not a book or a story. It is just noise. There is nothing more annoying than reading a book or watching a movie that does not make sense.

It does not matter how bizarre the plot is or how fanciful the premise. If the plot unfolds from the premise, the story can be followed. It does not matter how ordinary the setting is, if the story line does not follow any logical chain of events. The story because nothing but a series of disconnected events.

Lies are like that. If you are questioned by the police and the stream of events you tell lack coherency, they know you are lying.

One cannot just miss out blocks of time, nor be doing two different things at two different locations, at once.

But if we have lies, and if there is incoherency, there must be truth and coherency? If we seek to fix a problem, there must be a solution. No matter how bad a relationship is, if we are attempting to fix it, there is a state of existence in which these problems would not exist. The problem for realists is that there is no perfection in their system. The thing that is, is as it is and there is no metaphysical Platonic Ideal to guide us in its modification.

Civilization is, indeed, a figment of our imagination. A greater part of it does not exist anywhere other than the imagination.

In a truly materialist world, cathedrals could not be built, there could be no envisioning such a thing. How does development occur without metaphysics, without the unreal being real in some subtle sense? This reality is not just about what the senses provide us.

The question is, once a person has rejected God, what options does he or she have? Demonology is not about the study of alien forces taking over people’s souls while they are asleep or otherwise preoccupied. The devil is not like that.

There are songs and stories about people making Faustian bargains. But even though this does happen the usual experience is more mundane. Generally evil comes riding on a white horse.

As the old adage has it: “Hi! I am from the government, and I am here to help.” Evil does not arrive in the dark, it comes in the form of a charitable institution seeking to right a wrong and restore justice. Evil is justice giving everyone the vote and a chance at a better life.

There is, as one author stated, more harm done by someone trying to do good than anything done by someone doing evil. Of course, almost no one admits to doing evil. Regardless of what it is, it is justified by the one performing the act. Every criminal act is in the mind of the criminal, an act of retributive justice.

Many people live off of the need for restorative justice, regardless of how long ago the perceived injustice happened or how divorced the present system is from that time.

Evil, in the eyes of many, is inherited as a genetic trait.

However, the reality is, no one seems to comprehend what evil is, other than it impacted someone badly. If we lose our job or do not do well, that is an evil thing. But the victim does not actually look at the devil, he looks at the person whom he thinks served as the vehicle through which the evil was imposed on him or her.

Evil appears to be a crime without a law making it illegal. This leaves evil as something in the eye of the beholder. Which brings us to the Biblical injunction to look at the beam in our own eye, before protesting the mote in the eye of the other person.

Underneath all of the narrative is an attack on a person’s power. There are two types or forms of evil, there is the kind that the devil portrays as evil and there is the kind that is incompatible with Gods authority.

Demonic evil hurts your freedom and liberties and the exercise of your power. Being against abortion is evil because it takes power away from the woman.

Opposing free speech is evil because it removes from us the power of expression. But hate speech is evil because it makes us feel powerless and frightened.

This is not to say some evil is not an attack on our power in a real sense of the word, but limiting our power is not in itself evil, which is what the position of the devil is.

The devil wants to give us freedom, and he portrays God and His followers as anti freedom and anti liberal.

Here is where we get to the line of division. Because God is not against freedom or power, but these are not First Order Principles. To have power and freedom is not an ultimate or unqualified right.

We do not get to have life regardless of the cost. We do not get to have speech or anything else, without there being some justification for it. In the philosophy of God, we have all the rights we can pay for and none of the rights that must be subsidized by other people.

If the worker is worthy of his wages, then no one else has a claim on them.

It honestly does not take a lot of thought to realize where we are going with this. If the devil thinks opposing his power is evil he is doing things others oppose. But then, why does the devil want power and what does power look like?

No one has power over others, but the devil wants power over others. We think the strong can rule the weak. This is not technically true. The strong threaten the weak and hurt them and threaten to kill them. But this still cannot make the weak do what the strong wish, unless the weak puts the preservation of property, in this case his body, before his honor.

However, even though this can be done it is highly ineffective. Threatening individuals with physical violence is labor intensive and time consuming. And so power is usually exercised indirectly. If the strong controls the water supply, the strong has leverage over those who need access to this water.

This is the basic idea behind government and capitalism. The strong hold the weak hostage because of the ability of the powerful to control access to something the weak needs. There is a type of quid pro quo that is used that is corrupted. Politicians will ask you to vote for them and they will give you some benefit. What they do not tell you that you need to comply with their orders, once elected, or you will suffer physical harm.

Globalism is a process of systematically depriving the regular person of resources. Debt is a perfect means of control. Put a person, city or nation in enough debt and they are made a slave.

Evil asks the question, “If you could life without working, would you?” for those who respond affirmatively the devil teaches his disciple the manipulation of power. Power is used in lieu of something of value. This is in contradiction to those who reject the devils offer. This is all that happens when one is saved and another condemned. We either pay our own way, or we conspire to defraud the worker of his wages.

Its not very complicated or dramatic, but that is all evil is when compared to what belongs to God.

However, it starts with God and what belongs to God, because in the end evil is about stripping from God what God created, because in the end one either follows God and obeys Him, or finds ways of claiming what belongs to God.

It still comes down to depriving the worker of His wages, but in the deepest sense of the expression, the worker that is being deprived is God.

However, do not be deceived, there is a human worker deserving of human wages. This is the perfectionist. Democracy is a mechanism globalist use to strip the worker of what is rightfully theirs.

Democracy may appear to be a wonderful thing in this system of things. But think of what you are comparing it to. If we stop thinking about democracy as something better than tyranny, and think of it in a logical context, it is easier to see it is demonic and one of the most corrupt institutions there is.

Let me explain it this way, imagine a jail with the worst inmates imaginable? Do you think the jail ought to be run democratically? Of course not, but those same people are out here in the world and democracy gives them the choice of voting down Christians and the law-abiding person. Because they are criminals they do not wish to work, so why ought they to vote? That is not God’s system whether you can see this in the Bible or not.

To understand the evil that is democracy we only need to refer back to the definition of evil as the depriving someone of what is rightfully theirs. The greatest evil is taking the world that belongs to God and claiming it as private of public property. No one has a right to claim what belongs to God. A lesser evil is claiming what belongs to an individual. God created the earth and owns it. We add value to the assets of the earth, and we own this value. In economic terms God owns the assets and we own the equity we add to the assets.

It is all so simple it is hard to imagine why we are still in this system. All we ever had to do was to eliminate parasites, but the state is a parasite and needs parasites to justify its existence, so there is no benefit for the state of its allies to eliminate or even lessen the parasitism.

This is why we are being pushed steadily towards globalism and a one world government that owns and controls everything.

On the positive side, stopping the process is easy. Apriorian Apologetics is a system that can be implement by any few persons, even three housewives is sufficient to begin the transformation, with the addition of a unit of account. This is a new kind of money issued as equity. It creates no inflation or inequality and does not permit taxation.

Therefore, to eliminate demonic possession we only need to eliminate parasitism. As said, this is easily done utilizing Apriorian Apologetics. We have, as Christians, hope in the future because we have the tools to eliminate parasites. Praise be to God.